Expansion can be a double-edged sword for founder-led companies, as growth often leads to increased reliance on the founder. This phenomenon occurs when the business reaches a revenue plateau or when the founder feels compelled to remain heavily involved in daily operations, creating a hidden bottleneck that hinders further scaling. As the company appears to grow, its dependence on the founder can actually intensify.
Identifying the seven key areas of founder dependency
Founder dependency is not necessarily a sign of poor management, but rather a natural consequence of the founder’s strengths being embedded in the company’s operating model. A case in point is a writer who built a business to €2.5 million in revenue with 15 employees, only to realize that their involvement in decisions, customer relationships, sales, problem-solving, and knowledge was stifling growth.
After redesigning the business, the writer was able to grow it to €42 million in revenue, with over 250 employees and operations in 35 countries. This experience led to the writing of the international bestseller Breaking Out of Founder’s Prison, which explores this phenomenon. The author has since worked with over 100 entrepreneurs, identifying seven key areas where founder dependency often lurks, interconnected by time, decision, knowledge, customer, sales, leadership, and innovation.
Founders often possess critical knowledge that is not immediately apparent, such as understanding customer motivations, pricing strategies, or supplier relationships. This knowledge can become a dependency if the business cannot access it without the founder. To mitigate this, the founder can identify the knowledge that the organization repeatedly needs and turn it into transferable processes, principles, systems, data, intellectual property, or capabilities in other people. By doing so, the founder can ensure that the business can function independently, without relying on their personal expertise.
Related Post: Pension funds back UK business growth
Shifting customer and sales relationships from personal to institutional
Founder involvement can be a powerful asset in winning and retaining key customers, particularly in the early stages of a business. However, this can become a liability if customers remain loyal primarily to the founder rather than the company. If a single individual holds the commercial goodwill, the business is at risk. In contrast, a company with strong institutional relationships is more resilient and less dependent on the founder. The author notes that “if you disappeared for four weeks, what would stop working?” – this question can help reveal where the founder’s time is still structurally embedded in the company.
Structural changes required for leadership and innovation
The team looks to the founder for leadership, and while delegating work is relatively easy, delegating decision-making and leadership is more challenging. Employees watch the founder to understand what matters, and managers may wait for the founder’s input before making difficult decisions. This can create a situation where the organizational chart and behavior are mismatched. The founder should examine the structure around their team, ensuring that they have clear responsibilities, decision rights, information, authority, and accountability. By doing so, the founder can empower their team to take ownership of their responsibilities, rather than relying on the founder’s leadership.
Decisions to retain founder after acquiring company
Acquiring a business does not always mean replacing the founder. Jack Hayes of Champions Speakers Agency explains the logic behind keeping a founder after buying a 40-year-old company. He details the specific factors his agency weighs to make that decision.
Leave a Reply