News University Of Minnesota Law School
The boy mentioned he would like the jewel again, so the apprentice gave it to him, but with out the stones. Lord Chief Justice Pratt ruled that although the boy could not be mentioned to own the jewel, he should be considered the rightful keeper (“finders keepers”) until the original proprietor is found. In fact the apprentice and the boy both had a right of possession within the jewel , however the boy’s possessory interest was considered higher, as a result of it could be shown to be first in time. It along with …